DAST
Dynamic testing
Assess running web applications and APIs, including authenticated behavior and reproducible runtime evidence.
Application security assurance
Testing is the beginning. Verified risk reduction is the outcome.
Bring DAST, SAST, SCA, API security testing, PTaaS, business-logic validation, remediation and retesting into one application-security posture program.
Find the weakness. Explain the context. Fix it with the owner. Verify the result.
The operating model
Application security that survives beyond the report
EnProbe combines automated evidence and expert-led assessment outcomes into one application record with ownership, scope, technical evidence, business context, due dates, workflow and retest history.
The platform is designed to reduce duplicate remediation work while preserving every occurrence and source. This creates continuity across projects, scans, releases and customer-facing reports.
Core capabilities
What the platform brings together.
Every capability shares evidence, identity, context, workflow and audit instead of producing another disconnected queue.
SAST
Static analysis context
Bring code-level weaknesses and file or line locations into the owning application and workflow.
SCA
Dependency intelligence
Connect packages, versions, vulnerabilities, SBOM inventories and VEX context to applications and releases.
PTaaS
Expert-led penetration testing
Operationalize scoping, human validation, business-logic testing, evidence, reporting and collaborative retesting.
ASPM
Posture management
Normalize, deduplicate, prioritize, assign and measure application-security risk across tools and tests.
API
API security assurance
Evaluate authorization, authentication, data exposure, business flow and implementation risk across modern API estates.
How it works
From evidence to owned action.
- 01
Register the application
Connect the application, APIs, repositories, components, owners and environments.
- 02
Collect security evidence
Ingest EnProbe assessment results and supported automated sources without losing provenance.
- 03
Prioritize in context
Consider reachability, exploit signals, criticality, production exposure and compensating controls.
- 04
Remediate and verify
Submit evidence, request retest and record an authorized outcome with history intact.
Expected outcomes
What changes when the evidence is connected.
- One lifecycle finding can retain many scan and assessment observations.
- Business-logic and expert-validated issues coexist with automated tool evidence.
- Developers receive the affected location, evidence, priority reasons and next safe action.
- Customers see approved findings, report availability, remediation progress and verified outcomes.
Frequently asked
Questions about application security assurance.
Does ASPM replace manual penetration testing?
No. ASPM organizes and operationalizes security evidence. Human testing remains essential for complex logic, chained attacks, context and assurance.
Why separate a finding from an occurrence?
The same issue may appear in many tests. One lifecycle finding prevents duplicate remediation while occurrences preserve recurrence history and source evidence.
What makes a retest different from a rescan?
A retest is controlled verification of the specific reported weakness and submitted fix within the intended scope. A rescan is simply another tool execution.
The bottom line
EnProbe turns disconnected scanners, cloud signals, asset data and expert findings into one explainable, prioritized and verifiable security program.
Discover what exists. Test what can fail. Understand what matters. Fix it with the right owner. Retest it with evidence. Prove that risk is being reduced.